tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-71460315477975733412024-03-05T22:34:35.742-05:00A Fresh Perspective on EconomicsWelcome to Rye Country Day's Economic BlogAlex Osbornehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06339415004177031988noreply@blogger.comBlogger58125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7146031547797573341.post-4288285796339046122007-01-21T17:37:00.000-05:002008-11-13T02:04:16.632-05:00Featured Entry - Dice-K Matsuzaka - Worth $51.5 million? Is anyone?<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh6BzHSW2NeDdsvf1c81SDh7Ftj9LXx7IQHyUVb9P7WR2VdFPANtoKSWUVGxz-yDnTnKFq4hzMGIg5EXpROZ8TVC5tLAL2LbOkWcKLWW-qgoVmEGe7NQmHBXIDazLQWBEJsFwCWdCQQQL5M/s1600-h/boston-red-sox_000.jpg"><img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh6BzHSW2NeDdsvf1c81SDh7Ftj9LXx7IQHyUVb9P7WR2VdFPANtoKSWUVGxz-yDnTnKFq4hzMGIg5EXpROZ8TVC5tLAL2LbOkWcKLWW-qgoVmEGe7NQmHBXIDazLQWBEJsFwCWdCQQQL5M/s200/boston-red-sox_000.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5022616878209566098" /></a><br />This week the Boston Red Sox made a big expenditure. How big? $51.5 million! The worst part is that this fee is merely for the rights to talk to Matsuzaka, a Japanese pitcher, about a contract. This price, paid to his team in Japan is just to talk to the young star, not to mention what he will be paid in salary. What price do Americans put at winning? I mean, granted the Red Sox are frustrated after a season of not making the playoffs, finishing third in the AL East, and worst of all yet again inferior to the New York Yankees. But when does the spending end? The U.S. government in my opinion needs to step in and do something. They need to somehow regulate the spending of the Red Sox, Yankees, and other baseball franchises especially when upwards of $50 million will not exchange hands ever again in America. The Red Sox are taking a big risk on an unproven, foreign player with an investment they will doubtfully see ever again. The spending needs to stop. Now this expenditure alone will likely not hurt the U.S. economy but the principle remains as a bad trend has continued of spending U.S. dollars accross U.S. borders. A value rooted in American history of a Protestant work-ethic and putting money back into your community so you can see the benefits has seemed to fade away, at least for now.<br /><br />-T. A. Canning<div class="blogger-post-footer">Fresh Economic Perspectives from High School Students!</div>Alex Osbornehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06339415004177031988noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7146031547797573341.post-62887548629253166852007-01-21T16:32:00.000-05:002008-11-13T02:04:17.072-05:00Featured Entry - Amazon<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_HJ0-mgD7gds/RbPfO24LBHI/AAAAAAAAADk/hq5f0FjRq_U/s1600-h/delivery.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_HJ0-mgD7gds/RbPfO24LBHI/AAAAAAAAADk/hq5f0FjRq_U/s200/delivery.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5022603455790515314" border="0" /></a>Amazon wants to add an online food store to their inventory. By doing so, they will enter in competition with other services such as Pea Pod. However, with Amazons current popularity and American Dependency on the Internet, I think Amazon might actually profit. “Prime” is now a major competitor of Amazon. However, because of “Prime’s” inventory, they are able to ship cheaper, holding the upper hand in control of both company’s profit margins. As a result, Amazon raised prices in order to match “Primes” prices.<span style=""> </span>Amazon also has a huge impact on related industries such as gas, local shops, and public mailing. If Americans are buying everything online, they are depriving the small local businesses. This also means that the gas and travel isn’t necessary.<span style=""> </span>In contrast lower gas usage means that the goods need to find an alternative method of reaching its customers, meaning UPS gets a lot of business, upping the UPS shipping companies. <br /><br />-Chelsea Gaulin<div class="blogger-post-footer">Fresh Economic Perspectives from High School Students!</div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7146031547797573341.post-86060436541920928362007-01-21T16:29:00.003-05:002008-11-13T02:04:17.229-05:00Featured Entry - Wal-Mart Plans to Test Online Films<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_HJ0-mgD7gds/RbPe5W4LBGI/AAAAAAAAADY/eJA7CNMewb0/s1600-h/dvds.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_HJ0-mgD7gds/RbPe5W4LBGI/AAAAAAAAADY/eJA7CNMewb0/s200/dvds.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5022603086423327842" border="0" /></a><br />Wal-Mart is planning to test, much the way itunes has, the selling of full movies online. The program will be launched next year, and the business plan is pretty fantastic. In order to avoid the extinction of DVD’s, Wal-Mart will have its consumers buy the DVD of any given movie, and charge only a bit extra for online downloading. Essentially, a user who – because we live in a society that demands instant satisfaction – cares to watch a movie can buy a DVD online and pay an extra few dollars to download that same film to his or her personal computer. Wal-Mart is smart to strategize as they have. In doing so, they will protect their own DVD stock, as users will be able to watch the movie right away on a personal computer, but will also be ordering the $10 to $15 DVD, which will be received by mail.<br /> With the exception of launching this new program, hosting films online cost Wal-Mart little extra and is almost certain to generate more revenue. It also helps them to, possibly in the future, phase out some products offered at stores by offering them online instead.<br /><br />-Matt Shapiro<div class="blogger-post-footer">Fresh Economic Perspectives from High School Students!</div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7146031547797573341.post-54510464443514166972007-01-21T16:29:00.001-05:002008-11-13T02:04:17.404-05:00Featured Entry - Space To Spare<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_HJ0-mgD7gds/RbPdDG4LBEI/AAAAAAAAADA/nwFElcbt0YM/s1600-h/image1.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_HJ0-mgD7gds/RbPdDG4LBEI/AAAAAAAAADA/nwFElcbt0YM/s200/image1.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5022601054903796802" border="0" /></a><br />The article in the New York Times is about American self-storage, a storage facility in New York City. The facility has benefited from the recent housing boom, as those moving have been in need of temporary space to store items nonessential to their adjustment to new living conditions. Many people who upgrade move from larger apartments in decent neighborhoods to smaller apartments in better locations. It’s become somewhat of a trend lately, and has allowed for storage companies such as American Self Storage to flourish. However, execs did mention that they have become more cautious. A burst in the real-estate bubble – as has been predicted – could very well topple them. So although American self-storage is expanding, they’re doing so incrementally.<br /> I tend to believe in a more cautious approach. Though hypothetically, now is the time to capitalize on market wealth, it’s also a time to reconsider the market’s stability. It’s a bit of an unhealthy balance at the moment and the American self-storage industry is taking it in stride.<br /><br />-Matt Shapiro<div class="blogger-post-footer">Fresh Economic Perspectives from High School Students!</div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7146031547797573341.post-25253159102347045982007-01-21T16:28:00.000-05:002008-11-13T02:04:17.544-05:00Featured Entry - How Art Is Maintaining its Value<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_HJ0-mgD7gds/RbPd_24LBFI/AAAAAAAAADM/DUqmaWZAcec/s1600-h/goatpsd.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_HJ0-mgD7gds/RbPd_24LBFI/AAAAAAAAADM/DUqmaWZAcec/s200/goatpsd.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5022602098580849746" border="0" /></a><br />How is art maintaining its value over time? If, as we assume, new artists boasting considerable talent, conceiving of fine work and applying innovative concepts emerge – perhaps in great clusters – how will the prices of “older” art respond? Will these prices flood the market and lessen the value of art in general or not? How deep are the pockets of this consumer base? Will there continue to be a buyer willing to pay six figures and more for what is, essentially, a useless ornament? I, personally, like the idea of Galenson using statistics to reason how age might correspond with the prices of art. Just as Billy Beane uses stats to build a highly successful baseball franchise, Galenson uses statistics to determine the prices of great masterpieces. Some ask how one can quantify art (the way someone can baseball statistics). However, I believe the art itself and economic aspects of it are two completely different parts.<br /> Just as there are two buyers, one who buys simply to invest and another who appreciates the aesthetics of the piece – are two different lenses through which we can view art. One is aesthetic analysis, and the other is art’s place in an individual’s financial plan, as well as the economy as a whole. It’s bewildering to me how much people spend on art. However it seems a worthwhile investment for some assuming prices continue to rise as they have, and there’s more demand for spectacular old than there is supply.<br /><br />-Matt Shapiro<div class="blogger-post-footer">Fresh Economic Perspectives from High School Students!</div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7146031547797573341.post-39200042974230934292007-01-19T11:54:00.000-05:002008-11-13T02:04:17.696-05:00Featured Entry - Melé in Miami<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjhKeYaIJMBeFVsuBfnEl3be130m6MmI5IRmYVVrNu6gAVT32YVl7R0tda7-bEUiPrHEhxEYE6AWR564z7nZXc_YJc2foSGtD_BrrmTJ4B1oElgyEPBDYB6UDLZch1afvEecGzcrR6zZUFi/s1600-h/miami.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjhKeYaIJMBeFVsuBfnEl3be130m6MmI5IRmYVVrNu6gAVT32YVl7R0tda7-bEUiPrHEhxEYE6AWR564z7nZXc_YJc2foSGtD_BrrmTJ4B1oElgyEPBDYB6UDLZch1afvEecGzcrR6zZUFi/s200/miami.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5021863996212381058" /></a><br /><br />I can agree with the belief that emotions and ethics should not get in the way of economic thinking. What I cannot agree with is that the lure of financial gain should not get in the way of moral judgment. After the brawl that took place between Florida International University and Miami University's football teams just over three weeks ago, punishments were not appropriately handed-down. The images of brutality and thug-like behavior on the field should have been enough for Miami's President to harshly punish the team for such conduct. The President should have made a statement and layed down harsh punishments to set a precedent and discourage similar behavior in the future. So why didn't she? Miami has not missed a bowl game in over twenty years. Her thinking was that she was not about to let that streak end now. The lure of that paycheck from sponsers of the bowl game was too much too tempting. Miami depends on that income from bowl games to help its program. Now suspending key players for more than a game would jeopradize their overall record and likely keep them from a good final record and therein bowl eligibility. She missed out on a big opportunity. Those players have not learned a thing from this incident, excuse me, one thing: athletes can get away with anything. Behavior like that can be expected now in future years because no example was set. One losing season back in 2006 then will not seem as bad alternative as what the future holds for Miami's football program.<br /><br />- T. A. Canning<div class="blogger-post-footer">Fresh Economic Perspectives from High School Students!</div>Alex Osbornehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06339415004177031988noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7146031547797573341.post-55543258301654936582007-01-18T22:02:00.004-05:002008-11-13T02:04:18.032-05:00Featured Entry - Overpricing Art<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_HJ0-mgD7gds/RbA16W4LBDI/AAAAAAAAAC0/E5XA7F1T4yc/s1600-h/monalisa1000.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_HJ0-mgD7gds/RbA16W4LBDI/AAAAAAAAAC0/E5XA7F1T4yc/s200/monalisa1000.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5021572861207970866" border="0" /></a>As we learned in Mat’s roundtable, people are spending unbelievable amounts of money on art.<span style=""> </span>In class we spent most of the time discussing art’s liquidity, and the idea that it is only taxed once.<span style=""> </span>The major conclusion we came to was that the rich wanted wealth in something other then money in case anything goes wrong with the monetary system, but I have a different idea.<span style=""> </span>Maybe people actually like art.<span style=""> </span>But only the rich have money to buy the expensive art.<span style=""> </span>Also many people enjoy auctions.<span style=""> </span>The commotion of Auctions, and the thrill of so much money makes the art exciting to buy and overpay for.<span style=""> </span>Though I am sure the liquidity of art is maters to many of the buyers, but my two other points must be major contributors to the overpricing of art as well. <br /><br />-Alex Buckingham<div class="blogger-post-footer">Fresh Economic Perspectives from High School Students!</div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7146031547797573341.post-54261930431707076032007-01-18T22:02:00.003-05:002008-11-13T02:04:18.210-05:00Featured Entry - Over Fishing of Salmon in Russia<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_HJ0-mgD7gds/RbA1Zm4LBBI/AAAAAAAAACc/tSfzORLRtss/s1600-h/salmon-2.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_HJ0-mgD7gds/RbA1Zm4LBBI/AAAAAAAAACc/tSfzORLRtss/s200/salmon-2.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5021572298567255058" border="0" /></a>The over fishing of salmon near Russia is becoming a serious problem.<span style=""> </span>Fish are being hunted so quickly and effectively that they are unable to spawn at a fast enough rate to maintain the population.<span style=""> </span>The over demand for salmon for an under supply of fish is causing prices to go higher.<span style=""> </span>So how do we solve this problem of over fishing?<span style=""> </span>Tax both the fish, and the licenses needed to fish the salmon.<span style=""> </span>Tax for selling salmon, and then tax buying salmon.<span style=""> </span>Though this would probably hurt the economy and the fisherman, it is important to stop this problem. <br /><br />-Alex Buckingham<div class="blogger-post-footer">Fresh Economic Perspectives from High School Students!</div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7146031547797573341.post-39859100571258349162007-01-18T22:02:00.001-05:002008-11-13T02:04:18.358-05:00Featured Entry - Wal-Mart in China<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_HJ0-mgD7gds/RbA1wW4LBCI/AAAAAAAAACo/DCF8apSnxWc/s1600-h/walmart.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_HJ0-mgD7gds/RbA1wW4LBCI/AAAAAAAAACo/DCF8apSnxWc/s200/walmart.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5021572689409279010" border="0" /></a>Wal-Mart is opening in china.<span style=""> </span>It is competing with one other similar store.<span style=""> </span>At first I thought Wal-Mart would do great.<span style=""> </span>A whole new market with a booming economy, how could they lose?<span style=""> </span>But the general feeling in class was that the difference in values would people wouldn’t buy from a store like Wal-Mart.<span style=""> </span>For instance it is common to go shopping every two days or so, meaning most people probably buy in small amounts.<span style=""> </span>Another problem is that the products wont be that cheap, as they are made in china anyways.<span style=""> </span>However I believe he values of the Chinese people is changing.<span style=""> </span>They are becoming more western every day.<span style=""> </span>However with a communist government, how will they react.<span style=""> </span>Surly they don’t want to be America, and Wal-Mart is about as American as a store can get.<span style=""> </span>Therefore I think Wal-Mart in china will fail. <br /><br />-Alex Buckingham<div class="blogger-post-footer">Fresh Economic Perspectives from High School Students!</div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7146031547797573341.post-61283096400077414852007-01-18T20:38:00.000-05:002008-11-13T02:04:18.463-05:00Featured Entry - Tivo, the Best Thing to Happen to TV?<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhQ2YuIr1Dw3zt1hJTh4zzFFghZcs-4HQE0EWTfKC15Z2T7DElaCW_7_3-ll3tHeeV0bR4fPzeixAoqkkMFxKGiMZdI9JxpcShudJvKF1pNHoxsDehBTxSgTZPmnfEVQM25GCOPGGqNx75b/s1600-h/tivo.logo.man%5B1%5D-702907.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhQ2YuIr1Dw3zt1hJTh4zzFFghZcs-4HQE0EWTfKC15Z2T7DElaCW_7_3-ll3tHeeV0bR4fPzeixAoqkkMFxKGiMZdI9JxpcShudJvKF1pNHoxsDehBTxSgTZPmnfEVQM25GCOPGGqNx75b/s200/tivo.logo.man%5B1%5D-702907.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5021550360520557922" /></a><br />On the surface Tivo appears to be on of the best ideas for television in a long time. The customer can record his favorite show and then watch it at a more convenient time and just fast-forward through those borting and time-consuming commercials. Now, as we look deeper into the impact of Tivo on the industry there is a major loser in this new technology. The companies that advertise on television programs can deal with it, they can find other ways to spend their money. The group that will feel the biggest impact of the Tivo phenomenon is the television networks. With Tivo's increasing popularity, networks can no longer demand the same money from companies to advertise on their programs with the knowledge that there is a chance their commercial will not be seen. I think it may be too early to think about price controls. Although this could be a bigger problem in the future, TV networks have two things still working in their favor that will keep them afloat for the time being. At this point, Tivo is not yet in every household in America, most likely due to its price or the reluctance of people to deal with the technology. Secondly, networks have the luxury of charging a lot for advertizing spots on live programs like sports, where Tivo has less benefit. The whole thing has sparked great competition between networks for the big live games because they have become the most sought after shows as people are more likely to be glued to the TV set for three hours. Clearly one side would say no to the question raised by the title, it is like anything where there are two sides to the debate but in this case only one side matters, that of the customer, for they dictate and it's the responsibility of the networks to adjust. <br /><br />- T. A. Canning<div class="blogger-post-footer">Fresh Economic Perspectives from High School Students!</div>Alex Osbornehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06339415004177031988noreply@blogger.com6tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7146031547797573341.post-67450928089366529522007-01-17T01:02:00.001-05:002008-11-13T02:04:18.669-05:00Featured Entry - Cheap Sneakers<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_HJ0-mgD7gds/Ra28em4LA-I/AAAAAAAAAB4/1SV7OulLkEs/s1600-h/nba_marbury_195.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_HJ0-mgD7gds/Ra28em4LA-I/AAAAAAAAAB4/1SV7OulLkEs/s200/nba_marbury_195.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5020876393606218722" border="0" /></a><br /><p class="MsoNormal"><span style=""> </span>I lead a discussion on the release of the new Stephon Marbury sneakers and there effects on the sneaker market. These new sneaker are sold for ten to fifteen dollars without tax. The questions I wanted to answer during the discussion were: will they be successful? Will they lower the demand for more expensive products from major companies such as Nike? Can a company make a good profit off the selling of sneakers at a very low price?<br /><span style=""> </span>After researching the topic I found that the cheap sneakers were in fact very successful within the first month of there release. However, I predict that like any other sneaker the demand will fizzle, maybe even more so for these sneakers because the popularity was due mainly to the price. This sneaker will not have an effect on bigger companies such as Nike, this is because consumers constantly worry about quality and most are fine with buying expensive shoes as long as good quality is ensured. Company profit will be small and there fore it will not match that of a regular priced shoe simply because low pricing limits marketability and makes it a lot harder for the consumer to obtain them due to the fact that the aren’t available in all of the major distributor stores such as Modells.</p><br />-Josh Anderson<div class="blogger-post-footer">Fresh Economic Perspectives from High School Students!</div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7146031547797573341.post-83151769425374252992007-01-17T01:01:00.002-05:002008-11-13T02:04:18.839-05:00Featured Entry - Google CEO: Free Cell phones for all if…<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_HJ0-mgD7gds/Ra28uW4LA_I/AAAAAAAAACE/6ENvFII2FgA/s1600-h/razr_phone.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_HJ0-mgD7gds/Ra28uW4LA_I/AAAAAAAAACE/6ENvFII2FgA/s200/razr_phone.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5020876664189158386" border="0" /></a><br /><span style="">I recently read a document about Google CE0 Eric Schmidt and how he predicts that in the near future cell phone prices will be reduced significantly, possibly to the point of being free. Schmidt believes this because of the increase in big business advertising which has taken place over the last few years. This document sites a statistic which says that the average person spends at least 10 hours a week on the phone. Because of this cell phones have become the newest target for the spread of advertising. However, despite all this it will be hard for a phone to become free because the companies that sell them don’t want to lose that profit. I feel that advertising will most likely drop the prices, but not as significantly as people would think. Still any drop in price is a win for the consumer.<br /><br />-Josh Anderson<br /></span><div class="blogger-post-footer">Fresh Economic Perspectives from High School Students!</div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7146031547797573341.post-13589744821416611702007-01-17T01:01:00.001-05:002008-11-13T02:04:19.032-05:00Featured Entry - The Rise of Itunes<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_HJ0-mgD7gds/Ra28624LBAI/AAAAAAAAACQ/qRZ9QywPHLc/s1600-h/itunes_enlarged.gif"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_HJ0-mgD7gds/Ra28624LBAI/AAAAAAAAACQ/qRZ9QywPHLc/s200/itunes_enlarged.gif" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5020876878937523202" border="0" /></a><br /><span style="">The impact of Itunes on the music business has been heavily felt. More and more people are flocking to Itunes for easy attainability of the latest music, the lower product prices, and the added bonus features which come along with the music. I can’t remember the last time I actually went to the store and bought a new CD. If I go to a store for music, it’s to buy an Itunes card. These cards allow you to purchase a variety of music rather then be locked into one artist. Albums on Itunes normally cost twelve dollars. This is two dollars less then a store bought CD would cost. This leaves you with three dollars left over on your card which you can use to buy three additional songs or just save for later. The left over credit is exactly what the Itunes Company wants because people will buy more songs then they would if they were to only buy a CD. However, music stores such as Sam Goody suffer greatly from the rising popularity of Itunes. The one in <st1:city st="on"><st1:place st="on">Rye</st1:place></st1:city> just closed up due to lack of customers. Maybe it wasn’t totally due to the emergence of itunes but that store lost a lot of customer creating a surplus of product, which in turn generates less income for these music companies. Itunes eliminates the middle men which in this case are the Music Stores, creating more profit for the artists and giving the consumers what they want for lower prices.<br /><br />-Josh Anderson<br /></span><div class="blogger-post-footer">Fresh Economic Perspectives from High School Students!</div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7146031547797573341.post-36530792005958855762007-01-16T18:49:00.000-05:002008-11-13T02:04:19.190-05:00Featured Entry - Physical Education in the School Systems<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhWEkx3GDENO3xWGZ8HlcM_p9opfOafcaj8L1Hs_rhS_hRyCHrMTRNZxxwHOSHDtFz7tIznKgBo92jIt47gwEdI0CCZDsWe0gqlKsJfUhTW_MGj1np8_8892YiJOsqdf_cgB4zHuXHgGdOB/s1600-h/pic4.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhWEkx3GDENO3xWGZ8HlcM_p9opfOafcaj8L1Hs_rhS_hRyCHrMTRNZxxwHOSHDtFz7tIznKgBo92jIt47gwEdI0CCZDsWe0gqlKsJfUhTW_MGj1np8_8892YiJOsqdf_cgB4zHuXHgGdOB/s200/pic4.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5020780367373665618" /></a><br />The roundtable about physical education in schools caused a lot of controversy in the class. I believe this is because the subject involves the role of the government in personal lives. It is fair to assume that most people believe the government can control certain aspects of our lives, but eating and workout habits are very personal. Some argue that obesity puts a strain on the government so they have the right to control it, while others believe that people should be responsible for their own health.<br /> In schools, it is hard to say how physical education should be governmentally controlled. Even adding time to PE classes usually just means more time sitting around in gym class. In order for kids to get a good workout they must continue to be active. The problem then becomes how to regulate the actual activity of the kids during gym class. Although exercise in school is hard to control, eating habits are not. Schools have started to (and should continue to) increase the amount of healthy food in cafeterias. Promotion of healthier foods in schools will definitely help kids become healthier.<br /> The discussion ties into the American value system that we have been discussing in ID. Things that used to be taught at home are now expected to be taught in school. Although schools should require exercise and promote healthy eating habits, I believe it is ultimately the parents’ job to educate their children on health issues.<br />-Whitney Kamin<div class="blogger-post-footer">Fresh Economic Perspectives from High School Students!</div>Alex Osbornehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06339415004177031988noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7146031547797573341.post-85814562738272040092007-01-16T18:46:00.001-05:002008-11-13T02:04:19.298-05:00Featured Entry - Pop-Tart Problem<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_tAIXA91DTYU/Ra1kOZSQBUI/AAAAAAAAAI0/vHSGwuiFM6M/s1600-h/180px-SCEhardt_Pop-Tart_Brown_Sugar_Cinnamon_Box.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_tAIXA91DTYU/Ra1kOZSQBUI/AAAAAAAAAI0/vHSGwuiFM6M/s200/180px-SCEhardt_Pop-Tart_Brown_Sugar_Cinnamon_Box.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5020779358056351042" /></a><br />This is a perfect example of the butterfly effect right here. It all starts with one price increase, and everything else soon follows suit. But that first change, what triggers it? In this case, the scarcity of fuel. Oil prices go up and corn, a potential alternative fuel source, also rises in price. But in this situation there doesn't seem to be much of a solution. Oil is scarce, so gas prices will go up if nothing is done. On the other hand, if corn does become reliable as a fuel source, then cereal prices rise as well. I suppose this is where prioritizing comes in; what's more important, fuel or cereal? It's tough to say.<br />-Economics Student<div class="blogger-post-footer">Fresh Economic Perspectives from High School Students!</div>Alex Osbornehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06339415004177031988noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7146031547797573341.post-8853891401145933902007-01-16T18:44:00.000-05:002007-01-16T18:46:00.974-05:00Featured Entry - Highway Robbery at Rye Country Day SchoolIt was early September and I was signing out of school to got get lunch when it hit me, "you are wasting 900$!" Rye Country Day School has a meal program which charges roughly 900$ for an entire school years worth of food. As a student everyone who pays the fee is allowed to eat lunch at RCDS. This system is great, but I beleive the school takes advantage of seniors. Seniors are given off campus priveleges and are allowed to eat off campus. Assuming it only costs $4 to eat at Lenny's bagels, it would cost a senior about 700$ a year to eat out every day. What I don't understand is why parents and children are willing to pay the $900 cafateria fee, then go off campus to eat (sounds like Rye Country Day though). The School makes a large profit from this "priveledge" awarded to seniors. FLIK, the schools food service provider does not have to order food for almost 90 adults on a daily basis. This is a loophole that I thought was very intersesting. On one hand, families are wasting large amounts of money while the school benefits from this waste. <br />-Matthew Pollinger<div class="blogger-post-footer">Fresh Economic Perspectives from High School Students!</div>Alex Osbornehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06339415004177031988noreply@blogger.com24tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7146031547797573341.post-4111948907241610872007-01-16T18:41:00.000-05:002008-11-13T02:04:19.650-05:00Featured Entry - Incentives for using an AmEx<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhWZX4yIv0MDfof5PM7gSlf8_fUcS9YU8wJmJW8yQ47ii-ORAp7l4KFqbp1b9TvQj7mKvvjssDKuQNduinOF6-YFKf0TN0L_l7xhyphenhyphena629qJz988oeKCNE96hBn4ruQWHGvwlB5UTwXglkAI/s1600-h/amex.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhWZX4yIv0MDfof5PM7gSlf8_fUcS9YU8wJmJW8yQ47ii-ORAp7l4KFqbp1b9TvQj7mKvvjssDKuQNduinOF6-YFKf0TN0L_l7xhyphenhyphena629qJz988oeKCNE96hBn4ruQWHGvwlB5UTwXglkAI/s200/amex.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5020778292904461618" /></a><br />I read an article from BusinessWeek called “AmEx’s Holiday Gift Fever” that discusses American Express’s simulated Black Friday. They created a website that allows customers to buy sought after and expensive items for cheaper prices than retail. This program, available only to certain American Express customers, will create incentive not only to buy more products, but also to get an AmEx credit card for the benefits it provides its elite customers. AmEx also hopes to build brand loyalty among its card holders. They want to do something that competitors cannot match so that card holders appreciate the company and its benefits. Brands such as Porsche and Sony participate in the website, giving them exposure and advertisement to all American Express customers. This provides incentive for companies to offer things up for sale on the site. This year is not the first time the wish list site has existed, however membership has been growing rapidly. In 2004, membership was 235,000 while in 2005 it grew to over 400,000. Clearly, the site is having the anticipated and desired response. It is a great idea, I think, because everyone benefits. The site helps consumers, producers, and its sponsor—American Express.<br />-Whitney Kamin<div class="blogger-post-footer">Fresh Economic Perspectives from High School Students!</div>Alex Osbornehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06339415004177031988noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7146031547797573341.post-45825061375886976612007-01-10T21:33:00.001-05:002008-11-13T02:04:19.756-05:00Featured Entry - The Art of Pricing Great Art<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_HJ0-mgD7gds/RaWkeW4LA7I/AAAAAAAAABU/w4ltdcTco_0/s1600-h/war3.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_HJ0-mgD7gds/RaWkeW4LA7I/AAAAAAAAABU/w4ltdcTco_0/s200/war3.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5018598201218499506" border="0" /></a><br />The concept of spending millions of money on a piece of Art is very strange to me. My first reaction was, how could you have That much Extra money? And can you think of nothing better to do with it? But then again, from a financial perspective, investing those extra millions in art is actually a good idea. With the fluctuation in economy and tax rates, buying expensive art is an easy way to protect your money from being taxed and re-taxed as the rates change, allowing buyers to only paying a purchase tax. Also, it prevents your money from being effected by any temporary inflation and deflation. However, the purpose of the article, and quite an interesting question, - Who determines how much any given piece of art is worth? I think the key to this has much less to do with the type of Art (As much as I try to rebut that) and who the artist is as we think. Along with how much the artist might ask for, I think the worth and the value of a piece of Art work, is as much someone else is willing to pay for it at any given time. And I truly believe that logic applies to most things not holding a set price.<br /><br />-Chelsea Gaulin<div class="blogger-post-footer">Fresh Economic Perspectives from High School Students!</div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7146031547797573341.post-51092690029271655612007-01-10T21:31:00.000-05:002008-11-13T02:04:19.883-05:00Featured Entry - Olive Oil: A Guide for the gift-giving Season<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_HJ0-mgD7gds/RaWlHW4LA8I/AAAAAAAAABg/fVx_R21S5Hk/s1600-h/olive_oil_1.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_HJ0-mgD7gds/RaWlHW4LA8I/AAAAAAAAABg/fVx_R21S5Hk/s200/olive_oil_1.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5018598905593136066" border="0" /></a><br />Olive oil has become so much more than a simple ingredient. It is often considered the new wine! Now also considered a decoration, a gift, a collectable and so much more - that the value of a bottle of Olive oil has sky rocketed. Bottles of Olive Oil are being sold any where from $20 and up to $60 on average. However, depending on where it was made, and how virgin, or pure, it is - the bottle may well reach other $100. Similar to wine, good oil lasts gaining value over time. Imported oil have also become quite popular. Some of the best Olive Oils are imported from counties such as France and Italy, boosting the price per bottle even more. "It is worth the splurge for one of the more expensive extra-virgin Oils." According to the author of this article. In fact, in many ways, Oil is more "worth it" than wine. Wine tends to run rather expensive per bottle, and usually only lasts one sitting. Olive oil on the other hand is not only cheaper, and more prestigious and rare, but can last for months per bottle.<br /><br />-Chelsea Gaulin<div class="blogger-post-footer">Fresh Economic Perspectives from High School Students!</div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7146031547797573341.post-23073850968898844472007-01-10T21:30:00.002-05:002008-11-13T02:04:20.209-05:00Featured Entry - China’s Surge Raises Fears<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_HJ0-mgD7gds/RaWmVG4LA9I/AAAAAAAAABs/i3V6oJDBq2U/s1600-h/sh_teaday.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_HJ0-mgD7gds/RaWmVG4LA9I/AAAAAAAAABs/i3V6oJDBq2U/s200/sh_teaday.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5018600241327965138" border="0" /></a><br /><p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style=""> </span><st1:country-region st="on">China</st1:country-region>’s 11.3 percent growth is making other nations fear a “hard landing” and they are encouraging <st1:place st="on"><st1:country-region st="on">China</st1:country-region></st1:place> even more to lift the value of its currency (the yuan). I am wondering about the articles suggesting though- is it possible for a country to grow rapidly without inflation? <st1:country-region st="on">China</st1:country-region> has grown more now than ever before and they are on the way to reaching the 1 trillion mark, and have also surpassed <st1:place st="on"><st1:country-region st="on">Britain</st1:country-region></st1:place> in economy size. <st1:place st="on"><st1:country-region st="on">China</st1:country-region></st1:place> has avoided all major downfalls so far, so to me this means they must be doing something right. Instead of trying to change <st1:country-region st="on"><st1:place st="on">China</st1:place></st1:country-region>, maybe we should try to learn from them.</p> -Hayley O'Neil<div class="blogger-post-footer">Fresh Economic Perspectives from High School Students!</div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7146031547797573341.post-17661247980028545402007-01-10T21:30:00.001-05:002008-11-13T02:04:20.366-05:00Featured Entry - Increased Speed Limits<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_HJ0-mgD7gds/RaWj6W4LA6I/AAAAAAAAABI/jx9EFsAHfIQ/s1600-h/us-006_speed_limit_65.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_HJ0-mgD7gds/RaWj6W4LA6I/AAAAAAAAABI/jx9EFsAHfIQ/s200/us-006_speed_limit_65.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5018597582743208866" border="0" /></a><br /><p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style=""> </span>States around the country have recently increased speed limits. This presents a huge danger to fuel efficiency causing the new alterations to be widely disputed. Experts say that the connection between speeding and fatalities is actually not so accurate, and increased speeds may actually protect drivers. The cost of owning a car has spiked though in the select states; for every 5 miles a person drives over 60 mph, it costs that person an extra $20 a gallon and over a year it costs an additional $180 more to drive 75 mph as opposed to the traditional 60 mph. It is questionable as to which is a higher cost; possibly safer roads (created by the higher limits), or even more outrageous auto costs.</p> -Hayley O'Neil<div class="blogger-post-footer">Fresh Economic Perspectives from High School Students!</div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7146031547797573341.post-20544288492969367382007-01-10T21:29:00.000-05:002008-11-13T02:04:20.498-05:00Featured Entry - NY Dollar<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_HJ0-mgD7gds/RaWjTG4LA5I/AAAAAAAAAA8/NuPBiQ2_0NI/s1600-h/one-dollar.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_HJ0-mgD7gds/RaWjTG4LA5I/AAAAAAAAAA8/NuPBiQ2_0NI/s200/one-dollar.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5018596908433343378" border="0" /></a><br /><p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style=""> </span>The NY dollar is only equaled to $0.76 compared to the American dollar. Costs to build and live in NY exceed other American cities significantly. I think when people weigh the opportunity costs of living in NY the pros beat the cons. It is expensive, but wages are higher, and because there are no other cities quite like it (being the hub of business/stock market/foreign interaction) people are immediately and inevitably attracted. The fact that the NY dollar has a value decrease is negligible compared to what you are getting in return. </p> -Hayley O'Neil<div class="blogger-post-footer">Fresh Economic Perspectives from High School Students!</div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7146031547797573341.post-4988941570302592042007-01-09T20:10:00.002-05:002008-11-13T02:04:20.775-05:00Featured Entry - Housing Depreciation in U.S<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_HJ0-mgD7gds/RaQ-oGCdt7I/AAAAAAAAAAk/Kg-KlMWAziY/s1600-h/pic_5_house_1.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_HJ0-mgD7gds/RaQ-oGCdt7I/AAAAAAAAAAk/Kg-KlMWAziY/s200/pic_5_house_1.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5018204743334213554" border="0" /></a>I would like to discuss the recent depreciation in housing costs in the <st1:country-region st="on"><st1:place st="on">United States</st1:place></st1:country-region>. After the country reached a point where houses were overvalued, the prices have started to drop. The main reason for this price drop is that the demand for new housing is not meeting the enormous supply that has boomed in recent years. The depreciation of housing prices also has its effects among the people of the country and the economy as a whole. Since the values of people’s homes are decreasing, the individual feels less wealthy, and therefore, is less likely to spend money. This causes the economy to recede. In this way, the decrease in housing price lowers the total consumption of the American people. <br /><br />-Omar Zamir<div class="blogger-post-footer">Fresh Economic Perspectives from High School Students!</div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com60tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7146031547797573341.post-75644635393214683202007-01-09T20:10:00.001-05:002008-11-13T02:04:20.908-05:00Featured Entry - Inverted Yield Curve<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_HJ0-mgD7gds/RaQ-IGCdt6I/AAAAAAAAAAY/y7rpE4WZamA/s1600-h/invertedyieldcurve.gif"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_HJ0-mgD7gds/RaQ-IGCdt6I/AAAAAAAAAAY/y7rpE4WZamA/s200/invertedyieldcurve.gif" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5018204193578399650" border="0" /></a>Because of the current state of the economy and future predictions, the country’s interest rate yield curve is inverted. This means that for short term government bonds, interest rates are higher, and for long term bonds the interest rates are lower. The main reason for this inversion is that the economy has slowed, and the predictions lead to the Fed cutting interest rates in the future. When the country is experiencing inflation, the yield curve is opposite, as the Fed would tighten, and interest rates would go up in the future. I felt that this was an interesting issue to write about because the yield curve is a very simple graph, but is an important economic indicator that can say a lot about the state of a country’s economy. <br /><br />-Omar Zamir<div class="blogger-post-footer">Fresh Economic Perspectives from High School Students!</div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7146031547797573341.post-85147954661041447322007-01-09T20:09:00.000-05:002008-11-13T02:04:21.028-05:00Featured Entry - Border with Mexico; Economic Pros and Cons<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_HJ0-mgD7gds/RaQ_GmCdt8I/AAAAAAAAAAw/zosYDDG8lV0/s1600-h/74719-south-of-the-border-down-mexico-way-cancun-mexico.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_HJ0-mgD7gds/RaQ_GmCdt8I/AAAAAAAAAAw/zosYDDG8lV0/s200/74719-south-of-the-border-down-mexico-way-cancun-mexico.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5018205267320223682" border="0" /></a><br /><p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style=""> </span>The issue concerning illegal immigration over the border with <st1:country-region st="on"><st1:place st="on">Mexico</st1:place></st1:country-region> is one that directly relates to the economy of the <st1:country-region st="on"><st1:place st="on">United States</st1:place></st1:country-region>. Although President Bush has created a plan to build a wall across a vast majority of the Mexican border, there are many economic advantages of having undocumented Mexican immigrants in the <st1:country-region st="on"><st1:place st="on">U.S.</st1:place></st1:country-region> I do not believe that the economy of the <st1:country-region st="on"><st1:place st="on">United States</st1:place></st1:country-region> would function the way that it does without Mexican immigrants. These people provide cheap labor that many Americans are not willing to do at such a low price. However, I feel that accepting illegal immigrants does nothing to help <st1:country-region st="on"><st1:place st="on">Mexico</st1:place></st1:country-region>’s economy, which is the main source of the problem. Also, undocumented immigrants are often subjected to exremely low wages and poor working conditions that are a virtual form of slavery. Another negative is that the Mexican immigrants drain resources such as hospital funds from the <st1:country-region st="on"><st1:place st="on">US</st1:place></st1:country-region>. In the end, I believe that a larger amount of border patrol is needed.</p> -Omar Zamir<div class="blogger-post-footer">Fresh Economic Perspectives from High School Students!</div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com3